[2] most prostitutes were female slaves or freedwomen The balance of voluntary to forced prostitution can only be guessed at Privately held slaves were considered property under roman law, so it was legal for an owner to employ them as. Could the romans have built their great city without slaves The existence of slaves in the house naturally mean that, particularly the men, but also the women (although with the risk of pregnancy and disgrace), had access to sex whenever they so required Roman sexuality in its pagan times is perhaps hard to understand by western society with its values heavily influenced by christianity.
Children were protected from sexual activity, but only if they were freeborn roman citizens Prostitution was legal and endemic Slaves were considered as much their master's property in sexual terms as they were. For instance, cato the elder made money letting his men slaves have sex with his women slaves We can distinguish two types of roman slaves, based on literature, those living in the city and those neglected, living in the countryside. The roman society accepted and supported sexual mistreatment of slaves as part of its normal legal and social practices.
In a roman household sex was in plentiful supply Except, so it seems, between the actual married couples There is evidence to suggest that there were sex slaves in ancient rome This includes references to women being sold as slaves for the purpose of sexual exploitation in roman literature and art There is also evidence of sexual violence against female slaves in the form of archaeology and inscriptions. In fact, roman wall paintings, mosaics, and literature make transparent the multifaceted ways in which slave owners and other free persons relied on slaves' sexual experiences to meet their [end page 143] social, physical, and emotional needs and desires.
OPEN
