Aol did not identify users in the report, but personally identifiable information was present in many of the queries This allowed some users to be identified by their search queries. But what do companies do if an internal user accidently causes a data leak As such, the oblivious insider threat continue to wreak havoc. Aol's actions demonstrate a shocking disregard for user privacy Search terms can expose the most intimate details of a person's life
These details can be embarrassing and even cause great harm Would you want strangers to know where you or your child work or go to school How about everyone seeing search queries that reference your financial information, medical history, sexual orientation. A cached copy of the page is here Aol must have missed the uproar over the doj's demand for anonymized search data last year that caused all sorts of pain for microsoft and google. Aol thought that it wasn't threatening anybody's privacy because it stripped identifying information from the searches
Buried in a list of 20 million web search queries collected by aol and recently released on the internet is user no Several bloggers claimed yesterday to have identified other aol users by examining data, while others hunted for particularly entertaining or shocking search histories. This world premiere play is based on numerous trends pertaining to digital technology and the internet, as well as the data leak of over 3 million aol search queries by 650,000 of its users, first. The aol search data leak was the release, in august 2006, of detailed search logs by aol of a large number of aol users The release was intentional and intended for research purposes However, the public release meant that the entire internet could see the results rather than a select number of academics
Aol did not redact any information, which caused privacy concerns since users could.
OPEN
